"We will not issue any export licences where to do so would be inconsistent with these criteria."ĬAAT spokesperson Emily Apple said in a statement that the group was disappointed with the decision, but added: "The judgment has exposed the fact that the government's arms export licensing regime is incredibly permissive."Īt the hearing in January, the British government had argued that there has been a "sustained decrease" in the number of allegations of violations of international humanitarian law over the course of the war. With the Allies closing in, the Soviets make one last-gasp effort to turn the tide of the war.
The Government takes its export responsibilities seriously and assesses all export licences in accordance with strict licensing criteria. Download - Uprising (4.67 GB) Download (6.14 GB) Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 screenshots: A mysterious and technologically advanced third party joins the fray in the third installment of EA Los Angeles alternate history real-time strategy series. The judges, Andrew Popplewell and Andrew Henshaw, said in their ruling that the British government's analysis of potential breaches of international humanitarian law by Saudi Arabia was not irrational.Ī government spokesperson said. However, the court rejected CAAT's legal challenge in a written ruling on Tuesday. The Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) had argued the British government wrongly decided to resume issuing new licences to export military equipment to Saudi Arabia in 2020. LONDON, June 7 (Reuters) - Campaigners who alleged Britain was unlawfully allowing arms sales to Saudi Arabia for possible use in the war in Yemen have lost a legal challenge at London's High Court.
0 kommentar(er)
